National Information Exchange Model (NIEM) ProgramOverview and StatusOctober 10, 2008 Donna Roy Acting Executive Director, DHS Justin Murphy, Acting Deputy Director, DOJ www.niem.gov State of NIEM: Value Statement NIEM is the tool used across DHS, DOJ, and our state, local, and tribal partners for enabling interoperability at the data layer within and across systems, preserving investments in current technology, and optimizing new technology development. State of NIEM: Major Components Information Exchange Model Governed by Practitioners Information Exchange Package Documentation and Lifecycle image002 State of NIEM: Current Adoption DiffusionOfInnovation 2005 2008-2009 2010-2013 2014-beyond •DHS adoption at 35 percent of major IT programs, 60 percent for end of FY09 –FY08 focus on IEPDs has increased adoption significantly (over 90 percent of components with adoption) –Measure compliance with ITAR and IRB reviews –Built into SOA guidance and SELC •DOJ adoption –CJIS System of Systems –Terrorism Screening Center (TSC) –FBI’s Guardian –N-DEx/One DOJ –Future Development of NGI •DOD/DNI adoption through Maritime Domain Awareness and Ucore 2.0 •PM-ISE adoption of the TSC Terrorist Watch Listing and Suspicious Activity Reporting Functional Standards •25 of 50 states using NIEM –mostly in justice-oriented applications –Real ID implementation State of NIEM: Adoption Challenges •Confusing landscape –DHS Geospatial Data Model 2.5 –UCore 2.0 –Maritime Information Exchange Model 1.0 –Emergency Data Exchange Language (EDXL Common Alerting Protocol and Distribution Element) •Gap between implementation and NIEM IEPDS –DHS SOA Framework –DOJ Enterprise Architecture guidance –BJA’s Justice Reference Architecture •Trainingdoes not meet anticipated need in quality and quantity –Need to augment curriculum and need vendor help •Tools are kluged together, do not meet needs of most implementers –Need vendor help in tools development KLUGE: term frequently used by engineers to mean something not designed as a whole but rather put together from available parts. State of NIEM: Program Challenges •Inconsistent fundingfrom DOJ, DHS, BJA, and PM-ISE –Inconsistent amount, schedule, and contract vehicles –Strengthening program requires sustainable funding strategy –Appropriate model for funding, based on domain use –Shift from “free” to “subsidized” for services such as training and technical support •Growth focus and scope –Struggle with focus on data exchange versus message formatting –Domain growth: Who gets a domain? How many can we support? What makes sense? •Virtual program: limited dedicated federal support –PMO: Part-time DHS/DOJ leadership, supported by contractors –Fellows Program increased stability, focused on results, lacks top-down direction, temporary solution –Committees perform majority of work, with volunteers Road Ahead: NIEM PMO @ DHS DOJ CIO, Vance Hitch DHS CIO, Rick Mangogna BJA Director, Domingo S. Herraiz CTO PM ISE, Clark Smith Executive Director: DHS Donna Roy Deputy Director: DOJ Justin Murphy DOJ: Boris Shur NASC: Tom Clarke IJIS: Paul Wormeli DHS S&T: Denis Gusty DHS ICE: Phil Letowt State of Pennsylvania Representative: Linda Rosenberg Policy Advisors From DOJ DHS BJA PM-ISE Road Ahead: NIEM PMO @ DHS Leadership turnover activities: •Run program with minimal changes for three months •Document state of NIEM as of end of FY2008 •Assemble State of NIEM Team by November 1, 2008 –Program Management and Contracts –Technical Model and Tools –Marketing, Outreach, and Training –PMO staffing •In 90–120 days, recommendation report for NIEM ESC focused on sustaining controlled growth to meet program and adoption challenges (January/February 2009)